Showing posts with label legal news and industry updates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label legal news and industry updates. Show all posts

Thursday, October 1, 2015

Career Track Series*: Crimmigration - Ethical Obligations of this Practice Trend

By Erica L. Morris
Law Career Development Graduate Fellow

Crimmigration Or Crimmigation - Ethical Obligations to Know What It Is

Crimmigration is a word coined by legal scholars, and it describes the commingled consequences and practice demands of two important areas of law: criminal and immigration. Crimmigration is more than just knowing these two distinct practices, it is understanding "'...how they intersect. That is a crimmigation lawyer.'" (Steven Crighton, "'Crimmigation' Law Practice Niche on the Rise," San Francisco Daily Journal, Vol. 121 No. 180, published 09/17/15, quoting Cesar C.G. Hernandez, a law professor at University of Denver Sturm Collge of Law.")**

Crimmigration may also be described as "crimmigation" (as seen in Mr. Crighton's article), but from my findings, the former is the most commonly used term.


The Significance Of Crimmigration

In 1986, the Immigration and Naturalization Services (INS) removed 1,978 immigrants for criminal convictions. That number rose and kept rising over the past decades. INS removed 36,909 immigrants in 1996 and removed 240,000 immigrants in 2013 for the same reasons. (Crighton.) During the Obama Administration, where the President has vowed "to deport only criminals and repeat immigration violators," the numbers grew at a still startling rate. According to Migration Policy Institute,
95 percent of the immigrants deported from 2009 to 2013 met Mr. Obama’s stated national security priorities for deportations, meaning only about 77,000 of the 1.6 million illegal immigrants removed by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) over the last five years were rank-and-file border-crossers with clean records.

Thus, the impact that a criminal conviction has on an immigrant is significant and it affects nearly every single immigrant charged with a crime.

Friday, September 11, 2015

Two-Day Bar Exam Coming to California in 2017

by Nadine Abousalem
Communications & Recruiting Coordinator for Law Career Development

In light of New York's announcement of switching to the uniform bar exam (UBE) starting in 2016, California has announced plans to adopt a two-day bar exam instead of its three-day predecessor starting July 2017. California is notorious for giving one of the most difficult bar exams in the country and is also known for being the last to publish bar passage results.

While many exam takers will be excited by the prospect of significantly less writing on the exam, California is not planning to make the bar exam any easier and will set the scoring to keep passage rates low and consistent with those of the three-day exam. However, the proposed two-day bar exam will only include one day of essays and one day of MBE, putting the California exam on par with other jurisdictions in terms of length and content. Each exam day will be weighted equally for the final score.

What does this mean for exam takers? While the three-day exam allowed those who do poorly on multiple choice questions to pad their scores with killer writing, there will now be a heavier emphasis on multiple choice. Multiple choice will now account for 50% of the exam score.

You may read more about the changes from Solo Practice University's blog post here.

Thursday, December 4, 2014

How Does Proposition 47 Affect You?

by Sabrina M. Johnson, LCS Graduate Fellow

Proposition 47 - Criminal Sentences. Misdemeanor Penalties. Initiative Statute
  • Requires misdemeanor sentence instead of felony for certain drug possession offenses. 
  • Requires misdemeanor sentence instead of felony for the following crimes when amount involved is $950 or less: petty theft, receiving stolen property, and forging/writing bad checks. 
  • Allows felony sentence for these offenses if person has previous conviction for crimes such as rape, murder, or child molestation or is registered sex offender. 
  • Requires resentencing for persons serving felony sentences for these offenses unless court finds unreasonable public safety risk. 
  • Applies savings to mental health and drug treatment programs, K–12 schools, and crime victims. 
Official Title and Summary, prepared by the Attorney General 

Passage of Proposition 47 in the last election significantly changes how criminal cases are and will be handled statewide, with rippling effects in immigration and family law. It is also expected to cause a hiring surge in prosecutor and public defender offices statewide.

To help our students and graduates keep abreast of Proposition 47’s implementation, we at LCS recommend watching this free video, while earning free, self-study CLE units.

Monday, July 14, 2014

Student Blogging Equals Opportunity

By Henghameh Poya, LCS Intern

One of the most effective ways for 1L students to enhance their professional reputations and relationships is via blogging. There is a plethora of law subjects not covered in the legal blogging world. For example, say you are interested in tax law and working with underprivileged communities. You can start blogging about current tax projects with underprivileged communities and referencing news articles regarding the subject. Utilizing other social media outlets to expand your blog topic will connect you even further. Within months you’ll be recognized in the tax community. This in turn leads to more job and networking opportunities. Learn more here. For links to a wide array of law-related blogs, check out the ABA's "Blawg" Directory.

Friday, July 4, 2014

Controversy Abounds at the US Supreme Court

By Cynthia Chandler
Public Interest Career Counselor and Adjunct Professor

Over the last week, the US Supreme Court rolled out significant rulings that promise to shape our legal and political landscape. To enhance your own professional development, consider publishing your own analysis and commentary on the rulings. If you came to law school to work on controversies like these, make an appointment at LCS to figure out how. Here are brief summaries of the rulings; you can access copies of the decisions at www.supremecourt.gov. And to keep informed of Constitutional trends, check out the American Constitutional Society's "What's Next?" Conference Call Series: information at http://www.acslaw.org/WhatsNextSeries2014

Saturday, May 26, 2012

Employers Face Backlash Over Facebook Password Demands

by Jared Solovay
Director of Employer Relations


You sit down for a job interview and the interviewer asks for your Facebook password. It sounds positively Orwellian. Yet according to numerous news accounts, this is not only really happening, it’s happening a lot. In a weak job market, employers have greater bargaining strength, and some of them are using it to pry into your personal life. Claiming the need to screen out drug users, gang members and other unwanted employees, these interviewers insist on perusing through photographs, status updates and private messages. But is it legal?

Demanding to read a job applicant’s private electronic communications could implicate her status as a member of a protected class. For example, private messages might reveal the applicant’s involvement in a particular religion, thereby subjecting the employer to possible liability for violating anti-discrimination laws. Regardless, if it wasn’t illegal before, it soon will be in many states (and possibly throughout the country). In response to a growing outcry, the California State Assembly voted unanimously to ban the practice. Similar legislation is now pending in Washington DC.

In truth, lawyers tend to be more scrupulous than the average employers when it comes to adhering to the law in hiring practices, and we in Law Career Services haven’t heard of any legal employers demanding Facebook passwords in interviews. If you have, I invite you to email us and share the details. In the meantime, keep following this evolving and provocative story as it makes its way through various legislative bodies and the court of public opinion.

[ Note: Click here to read a previous discussion on this trend. ]

Thursday, March 8, 2012

State of the Legal Job Market

by Jan Nussbaum
Assistant Director for Professional Development


Recently I moderated a panel discussion on the current state of the legal job market. As part of the program, I summarized a recent NALP report on the subject. The conclusions in the report, which was based largely on 2010 national law graduate employment data and fall 2011 recruiting data, were consistent with comments made by the panel speakers - Errol Dauis from OneJustice; Jennifer Peneyra from Farella Braun & Martel; Char Sachson from the CA Attorney General's Office; and Heidi Timken from Timken Johnson Hwang. In summary:

Law Firm Recruiting is Inching Up: While the legal employment market has certainly not recovered to where it was before the recession, there are a number of signs that the market is slowly improving. Some practice areas have rebounded faster and stronger than the rest, namely patent litigation, energy law, health care law and banking. (1)

Smaller and Mid-Size Firms Have Held Their Hiring Steady or Increased It: While 2010 saw an unprecedented 5% drop in private practice jobs, this primarily came from large law firms. The number of offers made by the smallest firms (2-10 attorneys) has remained more or less constant throughout the recession and its aftermath, and this remains the most common destination for those recent graduates entering the private practice. (2)

Ms. Timken commented that her firm hired attorneys during the worst part of the recession, going from a three attorney firm to six. Ms. Peneyra stated that while Farella reduced their summer associate program size, and thus extended fewer offers to law students, when the need arose, the firm hired recently admitted attorneys, and continues to do so.

The national data shows an increase in recent graduate employment in business, government (primarily Federal), public interest and academia. (3) Ms. Sachson observed that State government hiring has been about the same from year to year, mainly from replacing attorneys who retire or leave. Mr. Dauis said some public interest agencies are expanding and some contracting based upon the amount of funding obtained from year to year.

Presentation and Preparation is Key: The speakers emphasized that while the applicant pool is highly competitive, what makes a candidate stand out is being well prepared and presenting oneself in a positive manner. This meant: 1) knowing as much as you can about the employer's and specific interviewer's practice and background; 2) having a genuine enthusiasm for wanting to do the kind of work that the employer is engaged in; and 3) connecting with the interviewer(s) on a personal level.

The speakers emphasized the customary job hunting tactics of networking, especially trying to connect with someone at the hiring agency or firm, and flawless application materials free of grammatical or typographical errors.

Mr. Dauis stressed the importance of having a track record of pro bono work for landing a position in public interest. He advised that many public interest agencies hire recent grads as fellows, and that this, or volunteer work, can lead to a staff attorney position in the future. The other panelists mentioned that in their sectors grades are important, but if you lack the grades, then obtain experience any way you can, including working as an intern, volunteering or a fellowship.

You can view the program in its entirety on the LCS Youtube page after it's been uploaded in the next week. If you'd like a copy of the NALP report, please contact me at jnussbaum@ggu.edu.

1 - "Banking" work is primarily litigation against bank mortgage practices and new government banking regulations. Cautionary Note: The European debt crisis has caused credit markets to again be wary. Thus, transactional work slowed considerably in Q4 of 2011, and has been sluggish in the first part of this year. This has mainly affected the larger firms (500+ attorneys).

2 - 59% of private practice jobs are in firms of 1-50 attorneys.

3 - "Business employment" is a broad category covering everything from in-house counsel, management consultant, contract attorney work through a temporary agency, and Barista work at Starbucks.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

"I Just Want To Be ME"
Employers Screening Applicants'
Social Networking Sites

by Jan Nussbaum
Assistant Director for Professional Development

I read in the Chicago Tribune last week that employers are not only keeping an eye on their employees' social networking sites for inappropriate content, but now employers are also screening job applicants by what their social networking sites contain.

While I know most of you are well aware that your social networking sites should not contain pictures of inappropriate or racy behavior, did you know employers are now going a step further to see what kind of attitude a potential applicant may have? Candidates are being rejected not only for bad-mouthing previous employers but for any type of negative comments on their social networks.

As reported in the Tribune: "Even posting information deemed to have a negative tone can turn off some employers, according to Vlad Gorelick, CEO of Reppler, a Palo Alto, Calif., firm that helps social media users 'manage their online image.' From what employers have told him, Gorelick said, it's a bad idea to constantly post 'I hate this' or 'this really sucks,' because it suggests you might be negative at work. After all, he added, 'Do you want to have somebody sitting next to you who is complaining all the time?'"

While employers often find positive information about job seekers, think twice about posting images or information an employer might in any way consider as evidence that you are not fit for the workplace. Keep that in mind as you social network.

Click here to read the full article, which also touches on privacy and discrimination issues.

Friday, November 18, 2011

Selling Pieces of Law Firms?

by Jan Nussbaum
Assistant Director of Professional Development


A recent article in the New York Times discusses the trend by Australia and now the U.K. to allow law firms to sell pieces of the firm to outside private investors.

The article discusses whether the U.S. will be next as the ABA is expected to circulate by early November a draft proposal recommending that ethics rules be amended. However, the decision is ultimately up to individual states. Washington State currently allows outside private investment, and a bill to do so was introduced in the North Carolina legislature. The Law Firm of Jacoby & Meyers is suing New York State’s court system to allow it to receive capital from outside investors.

The article discusses various ethical concerns, such as the attorney-client privilege, and whether lawyers might feel pressured to settle cases in order to make shareholders happy versus what is in the best interest of the client. This assumes that lawyers who currently own law firms are not motivated by profit. If ownership is kept separate from the practice, it can give the lawyers distance from business side pressures.

Legal experts expect that small to mid-size firms will be at the forefront of this trend due to the difficulty of raising capital in this economy. The hope is that by giving law practices access to private capital the firms can expand more quickly, invest in technology and other resources, and operate more efficiently at cheaper rates, providing better service to clients.

As a law student or recent grad it will be interesting to see how this unfolds, and the affect it has on law firm competition over the next couple of years.

Click here for the full article.

Monday, October 24, 2011

The Art Of Not Swinging For The Fences: Moneyball's Lessons
For The Legal Profession

In the movie Moneyball, Brad Pitt plays Billy Beane, the General Manager for the Oakland A’s whose strategies for recruiting new players were out of left field. For decades, talent scouts focused on the wrong metrics, according to Beane. What mattered more than the flashiness and home runs of years past was how often a player could get on base and score. In this intriguing American Lawyer article, the authors argue that the same basic philosophies apply to legal hiring. Flashy statistics like law school rank and a spot on the Law Review have been paramount for decades, but what matters even more is whether or not a candidate can write well and excel at interacting with clients. In fact, as Marjorie Shultz and Sheldon Zedek at U.C. Berkeley have demonstrated, there is often an inverse relationship between law school grades and relationship building. In other words, some of the best team players have far more to offer when you scratch below the surface.
- Jared Solovay

Friday, October 7, 2011

Reflections on Don't Ask, Don't Tell

by Jared Solovay
Director of Employer Relations


Last week, Dan Woods of White & Case LLP visited Golden Gate to discuss his firm's successful legal challenge to the constitutionality of the U.S. military's Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy. Mr. Woods led a team of lawyers in arguing that the policy violated the First and Fifth Amendment rights of gay and lesbian service members. A federal judge in the Central District of California agreed, granting an injunction covering approximately two million service members around the world.

Mr. Woods shared anecdotes and observations from the trial, including evidence suggesting that enforcement of Don't Ask, Don't Tell led to the elimination of key Arabic interpreters before the September 11 attacks, and also led to the military's need to modify its policies and admit convicted felons. Finally, Mr. Woods described the significance of the Ninth Circuit's ruling hours earlier vacating the District Court's decision on the grounds that the recent repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell rendered the decision moot. Watch a recording of this moving and thought-provoking presentation below.



See the rest here on our GGU Law Career Services YouTube channel.

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Be Interested and Be Interesting

by Susanne Aronowitz
Associate Dean for Law Career Services


"Be an interesting person and show interest in learning someone else's story." This was only some of the networking advice offered by attorney Matthew Ahn, one of several panelists speaking at the Asian American Bar Association's Annual Career Day last Saturday, August 27 at GGU. Ahn, an attorney with Morrison Foerster's San Francisco office, urged students to demonstrate genuine interest in learning about the attorneys they meet, rather than focusing on what that attorney might do to enhance their job prospects. By creating opportunities to connect over shared interests, students can develop relationships that will extend well into their professional careers.

Alameda County Superior Court Judge Stuart Hing suggested that as students meet people, they ask questions to learn about how they got to be where they are. By being an engaged listener, and by being diligent about staying in touch, students can build relationships with role models and enhance their own understanding of how to be successful.

Charles Jung, of Nassiri & Jung LLP, echoed these sentiments. When reaching out to new contacts, he suggested that students offer to buy the attorney lunch. "The goal is not to impress them with how smart you are," he said, but to focus on building a long term relationship. Audra Ibarra, of the Law Office of Audra Ibarra, added that it was essential to find ways of being of service to your contacts. Students often diminish the value that they might offer to attorneys. Instead, she suggested, consider linking your contacts with each other if they have mutual business interests. By connecting them to valuable resources, you can strengthen your ties and your reputation.

Jung also stressed the importance of getting "known for something." By developing expertise in a particular area of law, students will be able to differentiate themselves. Seek opportunities to publish on blogs or in law reviews as a way to both enhance and demonstrate your expertise. The best thing you can do to position yourself for a successful career "is to keep up your skills," he said. "The worst thing you can do is to not develop as a lawyer."

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Summer Hiring Holds Steady

Reuters reported last week that “law firms hiring associates for 2012 say they are planning to make the same number of job offers as they did for the 2011 class – and in some cases may even increase the number of positions.”

This is a positive indicator of job hiring for recent law school graduates and students. Law firms are noting the recent stock market gyrations but are not looking to recalibrate hiring numbers like in 2008 and 2009. According to the article, firm economics have improved. "For the top 100 law firms, gross revenue rose 4% in 2010, after 2008’s decline of 4.3%. Most indicators are the 2011 numbers will also rise. And while they are not hiring in pre-recession numbers, there is work for the associates that are there.”

With a similar or larger number being hired by large firms, there are that fewer number of recent graduates competing for jobs elsewhere - Jan Nussbaum

Monday, May 2, 2011

Managing Your Firm’s Online Reputation

"With social media now mainstream, the responsibility of understanding online personal branding and how it affects your legal practice is more important than ever."

Click here to read the article GGU LCS Assistant Director of Professional Development Marcie Areias wrote for the Bar Association of San Francisco Bulletin.

Friday, March 4, 2011

State of the Legal Market Address to Golden Gate Law Students

by Marcie Areias
Career Advisor


W. Jon Escher, co-founder of Solutus Legal, will visit campus to discuss the state of the legal market on March 10 from noon to 1 pm in room 3208. He will share his insight on the job market, what employers want, and the hiring practices of legal employers.

Don't miss your chance to be a part of his cutting-edge presentation. All classes are welcome, and graduating students are highly encouraged to attend. Lunch will be served. Please RSVP to lawcareer@ggu.edu.

Monday, December 6, 2010

ABA Top 100 Blawgs

Like your reading material short and sweet? Looking for some good reading between the semesters (and beyond)? Check out the ABA's list of Top 100 Blawgs--there's something here for everyone. In addition to the Top 100, the ABA maintains a directory of over 3000 law blogs. Set up RSS feeds for your favorite blawgs and let the information come to you!

View the ABA Top 100 Blawgs!

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

What's Hot December 2010

Curious what the future holds for the legal profession? Each December, consultant Robert W. Denney offers his analysis of "What's Hot and What's Not in the Legal Profession." Denney offers a broad overview of this year's major trends in law firm practice, including hot (and cold) practice areas, developments in law firm management, and changes to hiring practices.

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Report From The Nation's Largest
Public Interest Conference (Part 2 of 2)

by Leeor Neta
Assistant Director for Public Interest Programs


The annual NALP / PSLawNet Mini-Conference and Equal Justice Works Conference, which took place last month in the nation’s capital, are two of the most important opportunities for public interest advisors at the nation’s law schools — like myself — to attend substantive and skills-based programs. The following article is the second in a series highlighting the programs that I attended. (Read Part One)

Equal Access to Justice

One of the more inspiring presentations during the Equal Justice Works Conference was a discussion between Professor Laurence Tribe and Judge David Tatel on equal access to justice. Professor Tribe was appointed the Senior Counselor for Access to Justice at the US Department of Justice in March 2010.

In discussing his efforts to develop programs that address the justice gap, Professor Tribe admitted that there is no way that everyone who needs representation can get it. But he said that we, as lawyers and aspiring lawyers, need to ensure that we empower people to represent themselves whenever and however possible, e.g., through self-help initiatives.

Professor Tribe called for a greater commitment of resources to equal access to justice initiatives, and explained that Congress needs to be persuaded that they can save money by spending more money. Professor Tribe specifically addressed the need to support juvenile diversion and homelessness intervention programs. In the long run, he said, we need a much more stable source of funding for indigent civil and criminal representation. Law firms also need much more stringent pro bono guidelines, signature pro bono projects and institutions to reward pro bono service.

Turning to law schools, Professor Tribe pointed out that law schools tend to focus too much on “law” — a means, sometimes to oppression — and not enough on “justice” — an indisputably important end that sometimes transcends law. When asked what law schools can do now to promote these values, Professor Tribe claimed that law schools need to change, not their curriculum, but the way they are teaching classes. The law school’s leadership, attitude and focus all need to be aligned towards justice. Indeed, he said, we need to stop calling our institutions “schools of law” and instead call them “schools of justice.”

Finding and Making the Most of a Mentor

On the last day of the conference, I attended a session on how to find and maintain a mentor relationship. The speaker explained that there are three ingredients to successful mentorship: (1) reasonable expectations, (2) a strategic approach, and (3) a two-way relationship.

In order to ensure that one’s expectations are reasonable, mentees should ask themselves specifically what they are hoping to get out of the relationship. The mentor relationship cannot just be designed to find the mentee a job, but it can be designed to help the mentee acquire skills, act as a sounding board for the mentee, and offer answers to specific questions the mentee might have. Because no one mentor can do everything, mentees should “build a board of mentors”, each one of whom is available to provide advice and support on a specific topic.

Finding multiple mentors requires some strategic thinking, and that means planning where to find mentors and how to approach them. Everyone agreed that students need to create LinkedIn profiles and use keyword searches to identify potential mentors. Indeed, one of the attorneys in attendance confessed that she found a job through her LinkedIn profile.

Once a mentor is found, the mentee needs to make sure that the relationship remains “a two way street.” What that means is that mentees need to think about what they bring to the relationship — whether it be a certain kind of energy, a different perspective, or even knowledge about social media advocacy — and offer themselves as resources to their mentors.

Student Debt Relief

The Equal Justice Works (EJW) Conference also featured a lengthy presentation on student debt relief. For many years, most law school graduates that decided to pursue public interest careers had a very difficult time paying back their student loan debt. In the last few years, however, the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program (PSLF) has made it much easier to manage that debt. In fact, PSLF has made it so easy that, according to EJW’s expert on student debt relief, Heather Jarvis, “it is better financially in terms of debt relief to go into public service.”

PSLF was created by the College Cost Reduction and Access Act of 2007. As Heather often repeated in her presentation, to qualify for PSLF, a person must “make the right kind of payment on the right kind of loan while in the right kind of job.” After 120 qualifying payments, one can apply for and receive forgiveness of the remaining debt.

So what is “the right kind of payment on the right kind of loan while in the right kind of job”?

The “right kind of payment” is referred to as income-based repayment (IBR). IBR is different from a term loan of 10 years or 30 years because it is not calculated to be paid off in a finite period of time; IBR is calculated based only on one’s adjusted gross income. As a result, IBR is significantly less than most 30-year term plan payments. IBR is for everyone regardless of whether one is working in public service. For married couples, both spouses’ debt as well as their income will be considered for purposes of determining the IBR payment. You can determine your IBR payment by going to http://www.ibrinfo.org/ and www.finaid.org/calculators/ibr.phtml.

The “right kind of loan” for purposes of PSLF is a Federal Direct loan. It also includes Grad Plus, FFEL, Perkins and Stafford loans if consolidated with federal direct loans after graduation. The only loans that are NOT included are commercial or alternative loans, Parent PLUS loans, late payments, and loans that are currently in default. Even if some of your debt was incurred before 2007 (when PSLF was created), you need only to reconsolidate under Federal Direct in order to avail yourself of PSLF. You can find out what kinds of student loans you have by going to http://www.nslds.ed.gov/.

The “right kind of job” for purposes of PSLF is work for a government, 501(c)(3) charitable non-profit organization, Americorps, Peace Corps or most other public service organization. The definition is so broad that the only kind of work that is probably NOT included is for-profit sector work, international work, contract work, or work for labor unions. The work must be paid and “full time.” “Full time” means whatever the organization says it means or at least 30 hours per week. The work does not need to be legal, though one needs to be in the qualifying employment when forgiveness is granted.

The best part about IBR is that one can still qualify for loan forgiveness after 25 years, even if one leaves public service, if their income remains low enough for them to qualify. However, if one makes 120 IBR payments while in public service, her debt will be forgiven in just 10 years.

Heather also provided some brief information about two other programs: the Civil Legal Assistance Attorney Student Loan Repayment Program (CLAARP) and the John R. Justice Program. CLAARP reimburses a portion of eligible federal student loan debt for civil legal assistance attorneys—$6,000 per attorney per year to a maximum of $40,000. John R. Justice reimburses a portion of eligible federal student loan debt for district attorneys and public defenders—$10,000 per attorney per year to a maximum of $60,000. Both programs require a 3-year service agreement.

If you have any questions about any of these topics, please don’t hesitate to call the main desk at LCS (415-442-6625) and ask to make an appointment with me!

Friday, October 1, 2010

Check Out (and write for) the CEB Blog!

by Susanne Aronowitz
Associate Dean for Law Career Services


Looking for an easy and free way to stay current on developments in the law? Continuing Education of the Bar (CEB) offers a broad series of resources to assist lawyers and law students. Check out their blog (http://blog.ceb.com/), which offers updates on a wide variety of practice areas.

If you are interested in writing on your favorite legal topic, CEB invites you to submit guest blog posts (or ideas for posts, if you want to check in before writing) to the blog's editor Julie Brook (GGU JD 93) at julie.brook@ceb.ucla.edu. She will vet, review and edit pieces before posting. Take a look at past posts for a sense of the length and tone.

Ms. Brook is particularly interested in publishing a post on how it is to start a law practice - lessons learned, how it met or did not meet expectations, etc. She is also interested in publishing an "advice to new associates" post, as well. In most instances, she will profile the guest blogger in advance of their posts being published.

Friday, August 20, 2010

Deferred Associates Turn Backs On Big Law

by Jared Solovay
Director of Employer Relations & Administrative Director of HLP


As you've no doubt heard, a number of big law firms reacted to the recession by deferring their offers to incoming first-year associates. Some of these deferred associates collected their stipends and cooled their heels on the beach, but many others chose to work in the public sector.

This approach seemed like a win-win-win scenario under the circumstances. Firms held on to the attorneys they spent so much time and money recruiting and training as summer associates, while cutting costs by paying them a fraction of their regular firm salaries (which, in the upside-down world of attorney compensation, still turned out to be higher than many public interest salaries). The cash-strapped public interest groups obtained the services of talented law school graduates without having to pay them anything. And those newly-minted attorneys managed to get some valuable experience, burnish their legal credentials, and help other people along the way.

As it now turns out, according to this story in yesterday's New York Times, some deferred associates are now choosing to leave law firm life behind and switch to public interest law.

Still trying to chart your own path and choose between the private sector and public interest law? Make an appointment with an LCS counselor today.